Los Angeles, Aug. 6, 2003
CBS News
For decades, priests in this country abused children in
parish after parish while their superiors covered it all up. Now it turns out
the orders for this cover up were written in Rome at the highest levels of the
Vatican.
CBS News Correspondent Vince Gonzales has uncovered a church document
kept secret for 40 years.
The confidential Vatican document, obtained by CBS News, lays out a
church policy that calls for absolute secrecy when it comes to sexual abuse by
priests - anyone who speaks out could be thrown out of the church.
The policy was written in 1962 by Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani.
The document, once "stored in the secret archives" of the Vatican, focuses on
crimes initiated as part of the confessional relationship and what it calls
the "worst crime": sexual assault committed by a priest" or "attempted by him
with youths of either sex or with brute animals."
Bishops are instructed to pursue these cases "in the most secretive
way...restrained by a perpetual silence...and everyone {including the alleged
victim) ...is to observe the strictest secret, which is commonly regarded as a
secret of the Holy Office...under the penalty of excommunication."
Larry Drivon, a lawyer who represents alleged victims, said, “This document is
significant because it's a blueprint for deception.”
Drivon said the document proves what he has alleged on behalf of victims in
priest-abuse lawsuits: that the church engaged in Mafia-style behavior --
racketeering.
“It's an instruction manual on how to deceive and how to protect pedophiles,”
Drivon said. "And exactly how to avoid the truth coming out."
“The idea that this is some sort of blueprint to keep this secret is simply
wrong,” said Msgr. Francis Maniscalco, spokesman for the the U.S. Conference
of Bishops.
The conference said the document is being taken out of context, that it's a
church law that deals only with religious crimes and sins. And that the
secrecy is meant to protect the faithful from scandal.
“This is a system of law which is complete in itself and is not telling the
bishops in any way about how to handle these crimes when they are considered
as civil crimes,” Maniscalco said.
But Richard Sipe, a former priest who has written about sex abuse and secrecy
in the church, said the document sends a chilling message.
“This is the code for how you must deal with sex by priests. You keep it
secret at all costs,” Sipe said. “And that's what's happened. It's happened in
every diocese in this country.”
According to church records, the document was a bedrock of Catholic sex abuse
policy until America's bishops met last summer and drafted new policies to
address the crisis in the church.
![]()
July 29, 2003
Vatican document instructed secrecy in abuse cases
Kathleen A. Shaw
Worcester, MA TELEGRAM & GAZETTE
The hierarchy of the Catholic church has been instructed by the Vatican at least
since 1962 to keep certain cases of clergy sexual abuse secret under pain of
excommunication, according to Boston lawyer Carmen L. Durso.
A copy of the directive was sent yesterday to U.S. Attorney Michael J. Sullivan
at his Boston office by Mr. Durso, who said he believes the church has been
obstructing justice.
Mr. Durso said it might also explain why Cardinal Bernard F. Law and bishops of
the Boston Archdiocese and elsewhere covered up sexual abuse of children by
clergy.
Mr. Durso yesterday asked Mr. Sullivan to find legal grounds under federal laws
to prosecute those in the hierarchy who have covered up these sexual abuse
cases.
Houston lawyer Daniel J. Shea provided Mr. Durso with a copy of the Vatican
document, called "On the Manner of Proceeding in Cases of Solicitation" (Latin
title: "Crimen Sollicitones"). Both lawyers are representing alleged clergy
abuse victims in Central Massachusetts.
Paul Baier, president of Survivors First, a victims' advocacy group, who is also
familiar with the document, called the church's action in concealing instances
of sexual abuse "a coordinated effort of conspiracy."
Bryan Smith of Hubbardston, Worcester area leader of Survivors Network of Those
Abused by Priests, said people in the church who covered up for priests "should
be prosecuted.
"If it were anyone else, they would be in jail by now," he said.
Mr. Durso's action came after Attorney General Thomas F. Reilly issued a grand
jury report last week that was critical of the hierarchy of the Boston
Archdiocese for its failure to protect children from abusive priests. He said he
had no grounds for criminal charges. He determined that at least 800 children
were sexually abused by 250 priests in the archdiocese dating from 1940.
"This document may provide the link in the thinking of all of those who hid the
truth for so many years," Mr. Durso said. "The constant admonitions that
information regarding accusations against priests are to be deemed "a secret of
the Holy Office' may explain, but most certainly do not justify, their actions,"
Mr. Durso told the federal attorney.
"Indeed, the directions regarding both the hiding and the destruction of
documents should be evaluated in terms of the crime of obstruction of justice,"
he said.
Mr. Durso, accompanied by representatives of various statewide victim advocacy
groups, went to Mr. Sullivan's office in Boston, where he hand-delivered the
letter.
The 40-page document, which was obtained by the Telegram & Gazette, was
promulgated in 1962 by the Supreme and Holy Congregation of the Holy Office
under the pontificate of Pope John XXIII and was printed by the Vatican Press.
It is marked confidential and states it is to be stored in the "secret archives"
and is to be treated as "strictly confidential."
It specifically tells bishops, archbishops and patriarchs, including those of
the Eastern Rite, how to handle allegations that a priest made sexual advances
toward a person in the confessional. Confession is a sacrament of the Catholic
Church.
Two civil suits in the Worcester Diocese involve allegations that a priest made
improper advances to children in the confessional and subsequently sexually
abused them. The allegations were made by Karen Pedersen of Fitchburg in her
suit against the Rev. Robert E. Kelley and by Timothy P. Staney of Worcester in
his suit against the Rev. Jean-Paul Gagnon. The priests have denied the
allegations.
One section states that the bishop, who is called the ordinary, has control over
such investigations and in cases of accused members of religious orders, the
superior can remove the accused priest from ministry and "will also be able to
transfer him to another (assignment), unless the ordinary of the place has
forbidden it because he has already accepted the denunciation and begun the
inquisition."
The document said that because of the great care necessary with these cases,
those investigating "are to be restrained by a perpetual silence" and are
required "to observe the strictest secret, which is commonly regarded as a
secret of the Holy Office in all matters and with all persons, under the penalty
of excommunication..."
The oath of secrecy also is required of those accusing the priest and any
witnesses.
The directive also says the person who is solicited in the confessional must
report the incident to the bishop within a month or to the Holy Office. The
accused confessor is required to warn the person confessing of this duty.
A person who knowingly failed to denounce the priest incurs excommunication.
The directive calls for destruction of documents if the investigators find an
accusation "totally lacks a foundation." If the accusation is "vague and
indeterminate or uncertain" the records should go to the archives in case
"something else happens in the future."
If the accusation is considered "serious enough" but not sufficient to begin an
accusatorial process, information should go to the archive.
Should an accused priest go before a church trial, "in every way the judge is to
remember that it is never right for him to bind the accused by an oath to tell
the truth."
Mr. Shea in a separate letter to Mr. Sullivan explained that the 1962 Vatican
document appears in a footnote to a letter from Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who
heads the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, dated May 18, 2002, to all
bishops of the Catholic church.
Samantha Martin, a spokesman for Mr. Sullivan, said he would have no immediate
comment.
"We have received the letter from the group and we also have a copy of the
(attorney general's) report, and all the materials are under review," Ms. Martin
said.
http://www.telegram.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20030729/NEWS/307290469/1025